1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1997 Daewoo Joyster
To start off, 1997 Daewoo Joyster is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Daewoo Joyster (89 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Daewoo Joyster should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1997 Daewoo Joyster.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Daewoo Joyster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Daewoo Joyster (137 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1997 Daewoo Joyster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1997 Daewoo Joyster | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | A 60 | Joyster |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1497 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1280 mm |
