1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1998 Chrysler Chronos
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Chronos is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP) has 290 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (311 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1998 Chrysler Chronos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1998 Chrysler Chronos | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A 60 | Chronos |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 350 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 311 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3330 mm |
