1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1998 Toyota Caldina
To start off, 1998 Toyota Caldina is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Toyota Caldina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Caldina (255 HP) has 216 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Toyota Caldina weights approximately 352 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Toyota Caldina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Caldina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Toyota Caldina (324 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1998 Toyota Caldina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 1998 Toyota Caldina has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Toyota Caldina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1998 Toyota Caldina | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 60 | Caldina |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 255 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 324 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |
