1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2000 Lamborghini Diablo
To start off, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 5,707 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (485 HP) has 446 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (633 Nm) has 546 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2000 Lamborghini Diablo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2000 Lamborghini Diablo | |
| Make | Austin | Lamborghini |
| Model | A 60 | Diablo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 5707 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 485 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 633 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
