1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2001 Daewoo Vada

To start off, 2001 Daewoo Vada is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2001 Daewoo Vada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Daewoo Vada (105 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Daewoo Vada weights approximately 195 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Vada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Daewoo Vada (144 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2001 Daewoo Vada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2001 Daewoo Vada has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Daewoo Vada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: