1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2001 Jaguar XJR

To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJR is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJR (390 HP) has 351 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 651 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2001 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: