1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 60 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3060 mm |