1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2003 Toyota Highlander

To start off, 2003 Toyota Highlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Highlander (148 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 567 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Toyota Highlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Highlander (221 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2003 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2003 Toyota Highlander has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota Highlander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 60 2003 Toyota Highlander
Make Austin Toyota
Model A 60 Highlander
Year Released 1962 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1487 cc 2360 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 39 HP 148 HP
Torque 87 Nm 221 Nm
Engine Bore Size 73 mm 88.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 96 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 23.0:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1118 kg 1685 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1730 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 73 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]