1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Express is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Express (195 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1246 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Express (353 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2004 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 60 | Express |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 102.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2366 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 6210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 2090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 117 L |
