1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Ford Freestyle
To start off, 2004 Ford Freestyle is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Freestyle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Freestyle (210 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Freestyle should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Freestyle weights approximately 677 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Freestyle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Freestyle (281 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Freestyle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2004 Ford Freestyle | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 60 | Freestyle |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1795 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |
