1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2004 Mahindra Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mahindra Armada (74 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 880 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2004 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Austin | Mahindra |
Model | A 60 | Armada |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4310 mm |