1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Marcos TS
To start off, 2004 Marcos TS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Marcos TS (177 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Marcos TS should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 43 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Marcos TS (224 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Marcos TS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2004 Marcos TS | |
| Make | Austin | Marcos |
| Model | A 60 | TS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2544 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2230 mm |
