1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (225 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor weights approximately 627 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor (339 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 60 | Endeavor |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 95.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 81 L |