1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2004 Pagani Zonda is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 503 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Pagani Zonda weights approximately 132 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2004 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Austin | Pagani |
| Model | A 60 | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 542 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2730 mm |
