1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP) has 206 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 721 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 60 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 245 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 383 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1839 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 87 L |
