1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 507 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (262 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2005 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A 60 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2737 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 262 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 61 L |
