1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Holden UTE

To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden UTE (204 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 382 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden UTE (305 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2005 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 60 2005 Holden UTE
Make Austin Holden
Model A 60 UTE
Year Released 1962 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1487 cc 3789 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 39 HP 204 HP
Torque 87 Nm 305 Nm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1118 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2950 mm