1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 60 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 191 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |
