1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Sable (153 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 395 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Austin | Mercury |
| Model | A 60 | Sable |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 252 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1513 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |
