1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (73 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 45 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 60 (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 60 | Clio |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 17.9:1 |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 162 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 55 L |