1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Buick Rainier
To start off, 2006 Buick Rainier is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,194 cc, 2006 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Buick Rainier (271 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 2006 Buick Rainier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick Rainier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Rainier (376 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2006 Buick Rainier | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 60 | Rainier |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4194 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 83 L |