1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (271 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 60 | 6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 215 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 68 L |