1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Mazda Drifter
To start off, 2006 Mazda Drifter is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,606 cc, 2006 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Drifter (123 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Drifter should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Drifter (206 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda Drifter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2006 Mazda Drifter | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 60 | Drifter |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2606 cc |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 82 L |
