1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 308 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 60 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2262 cc |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 62 L |
