1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Nissan Serena
To start off, 2006 Nissan Serena is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Serena is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Serena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Nissan Serena has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan Serena will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2006 Nissan Serena | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Serena |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |