1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Matrix (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 60 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 45 L |