1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2007 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 132 L |