1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (321 HP) has 261 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (461 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2008 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 5328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 321 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 461 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 117 L |