1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (148 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 11 kg more than 2008 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (245 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2008 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 60 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1107 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 74 L |
