1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 176 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (184 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 60 | 6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 184 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |