1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Mazda Etude
To start off, 2008 Mazda Etude is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,839 cc, 2008 Mazda Etude is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2008 Mazda Etude.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Etude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda Etude (163 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2008 Mazda Etude will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2008 Mazda Etude | |
| Make | Austin | Mazda |
| Model | A 60 | Etude |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1839 cc |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1093 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |
