1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt (95 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 48 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2008 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 60 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 95 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 47 L |
