1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,768 cc, 2008 Nissan Almera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 12 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Almera (161 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Almera |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1768 cc |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 161 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |