1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP) has 250 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2009 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Suburban |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 310 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 117 L |