1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Voyager (141 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 922 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Voyager (320 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2009 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 60 | Voyager |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 2040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |