1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Dodge Charger

To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (368 HP) has 329 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 842 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (536 Nm) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 60 2009 Dodge Charger
Make Austin Dodge
Model A 60 Charger
Year Released 1962 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1487 cc 5654 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 39 HP 368 HP
Torque 87 Nm 536 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 23.0:1 9.3:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1118 kg 1960 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 5090 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]