1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2009 Ford Escape
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (153 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 152 kg more than 2009 Ford Escape.
Because 2009 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Escape (184 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2009 Ford Escape | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | Escape |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 184 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 57 L |