1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Ford E-250

To start off, 2011 Ford E-250 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 186 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1292 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-250 (387 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2011 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: