1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (158 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.

Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 60 2011 Jeep Compass
Make Austin Jeep
Model A 60 Compass
Year Released 1962 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1622 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 60 HP 158 HP
Torque 122 Nm 191 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4404 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1656 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2634 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 51 L