1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2011 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2011 Nissan Frontier is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Frontier (261 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Frontier (381 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2011 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Frontier |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 381 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |