1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Nissan Versa
To start off, 2012 Nissan Versa is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Versa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Versa (109 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Versa should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 3 kg more than 2012 Nissan Versa.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Versa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Versa (145 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Versa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2012 Nissan Versa | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Versa |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1115 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 41 L |