1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Renault Megane

To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (111 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.

Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (152 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 60 2012 Renault Megane
Make Austin Renault
Model A 60 Megane
Year Released 1962 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1487 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 39 HP 111 HP
Torque 87 Nm 152 Nm
Engine Bore Size 73 mm 79.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 80.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 23.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1470 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2690 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 60 L