1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2012 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2012 Smart ForTwo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Smart ForTwo (71 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Smart ForTwo (125 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2012 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2012 Smart ForTwo has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Smart ForTwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 2012 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Austin | Smart |
| Model | A 60 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 71 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
