1962 Austin A 60 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu (187 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 442 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu (244 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 2013 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 60 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 101 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1854 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2738 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |