1962 Austin A 90 vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1962 Austin A 90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 90 | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 90 | 12 M |
Year Released | 1962 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2500 mm |