1962 Austin A 90 vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 1966 DKW Munga is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 90 (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 90 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 90 | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 90 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 31 L |
