1962 Austin A 90 vs. 1967 Austin 3-Litre

To start off, 1967 Austin 3-Litre is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 120 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 90 weights approximately 46 kg more than 1967 Austin 3-Litre.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 221 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 90 1967 Austin 3-Litre
Make Austin Austin
Model A 90 3-Litre
Year Released 1962 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2910 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 4750 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 221 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 2700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.5 mm 83.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 8.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1524 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4720 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2940 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 65 L