1962 Austin A 90 vs. 1977 Volvo 164
To start off, 1977 Volvo 164 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 90 (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 164.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 90 | 1977 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | A 90 | 164 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3350 mm |