1962 Austin A 90 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 90 weights approximately 46 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Camaro.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1998 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 90 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A 90 Camaro
Year Released 1962 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 5666 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 0 HP
Torque 221 Nm 468 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.5 mm 99 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.1:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1524 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 57 L