1962 Austin A 90 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 90 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 90 (221 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 90 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 90 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 59 L |